from its website:
nef's new global measure of progress, the 'Happy
Planet Index', reveals for the first time that happiness doesn't have
to cost the Earth. It shows that people can live long, happy lives
without using more than their fair share of the Earth's resources. The
new international ranking of the environmental impact and well-being
reveals a very different picture of the wealth, and poverty, of nations.
nef's report, 'The Happy Planet Index: An index of
human well-being and environmental impact', moves beyond crude ratings
of nations according to national income, measured by Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) to produce a more accurate picture of the progress of
nations based on the amount of the Earth's resources they use, and the
length and happiness of people's lives.
The Happy Planet Index (HPI) strips the view of the economy back to
its absolute basics: what we put in (resources), and what comes out
(human lives of different length and happiness). The resulting Index of
the 178 nations for which data is available, reveals that the world as
a whole has a long way to go. In terms of delivering long and
meaningful lives within the Earth's environmental limits - all nations
could do better. No country achieves an overall 'high' score on the
Index, and no country does well on all three indicators.
Rank | Country | Life Sat | Life Exp | EF | HPI |
Reasonable ideal | 8.2 | 82.0 | 1.5 | 83.5 |
RP, 17th happiest state worldwide, Vanuatu happiest--study
LONDON -- The Philippines ranks 17th among the 178 countries ranked
as the happiest on Earth, according to a study published Wednesday
measuring people’s well being and their impact on the environment.
The tiny South Pacific Ocean archipelago of Vanuatu is the happiest,
with Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, and Panama completing the top five
in the Happy Planet Index compiled by the British think-tank New
Economics Foundation.
The index combines life satisfaction, life expectancy and
environmental footprint -- the amount of land required to sustain the
population and absorb its energy consumption.
Zimbabwe is at the bottom, below second-worst performer Swaziland, Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Ukraine.
The Group of Eight industrial powers meet in Saint Petersburg this
weekend but have not much to smile about, according to the index.
Italy came out best in 66th place, ahead of Germany (81), Japan
(95), Britain (108), Canada (111), France (129), the United States
(150) and Russia, in lowly 172nd place.
Andrew Simms, NEF's policy director, said the index "addresses the
relative success or failure of countries in giving their citizens a
good life while respecting the environmental resource limits on which
all our lives depend."
Nic Marks, the head of NEF's center for wellbeing, added: "It is
clear that no single nation listed in the Happy Planet Index has got
everything right.
"But the index does reveal patterns that show how we might better
achieve long and happy lives for all, whilst living within our
environmental means," he said, according to British daily The Guardian.
"The challenge is: can we learn the lessons and apply them?"
Island nations performed particularly well in the rankings. But Vanuatu, with a population of around 200,000, topped them all.
"Don't tell too many people, please," said Marke Lowen of Vanuatu Online, the republic's online newspaper.
"People are generally happy here because they are very satisfied with very little," Lowen told The Guardian.
"This is not a consumer-driven society. Life here is about community
and family and goodwill to other people. It's a place where you don't
worry too much," Lowen said.
"The only things we fear are cyclones or earthquakes," he said.
Also on the list are 23. Indonesia; 31. China; 32. Thailand; 44.
Malaysia; 62. India; 64. Iceland; 70. Netherlands; 87. Spain; 88. Hong
Kong; 89. Saudi Arabia; 99. Denmark; 112. Pakistan; 115. Norway; 119.
Sweden; 123. Finland; 139. Australia; 154. UAE; 156. South Africa; 159.
Kuwait; 166. Qatar.
Copyright 2006 INQ7.net,
Agence France-Presse. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
ON THE OTHER HAND: SUICIDE RATES PER COUNTRY
The following is a List of suicide rates by country according to data from the World Health Organization in which a country's rank is determined by its total rate of suicides. Male and female suicide rates are out of total male population and total female population, respectively (e.g. total male population divided by total number of male suicides). The total rate of suicides is based on the total number of suicides divided by the total population rather than merely the average of the male and female suicide rates, because the gender ratio in many countries is not 1:1. Year refers to the most recent year that data was available for a particular country.
This list should be used with caution. Little data is available documenting suicide rates in Africa, and the Middle East. Even in countries where cause-of-death data is collected systematically, differing societal attitudes toward suicide may impact the recorded figures (e.g., misreporting a suicide as an accidental death out of deference for the bereaved).
Suicides per 100,000 people per year:
Rank Country Year Males Females Total
1. Lithuania 2003 74.3 13.9 42.1
2. Russia 2002 69.3 11.9 38.7
3. Belarus 2003 63.3 10.3 35.1
4. Kazakhstan 2002 50.2 8.8 28.8
5. Slovenia 2003 45.0 12.0 28.1
6. Hungary 2003 44.9 12.0 27.7
7. Estonia 2002 47.7 9.8 27.3
8. Ukraine 2002 46.7 8.4 26.1
9. Latvia 2003 45.0 9.7 26.0
10. Japan 2002 35.2 12.8 23.8
11. Sri Lanka 1996 NA NA 21.6
12. Belgium 1997 31.2 11.4 21.1
13. Finland 2003 31.9 9.8 20.6
14. Croatia 2003 31.4 8.4 19.5
15. Switzerland 2001 26.5 10.6 18.4
16. Cuba 1996 24.5 12.0 18.3
17. Austria 2003 27.1 9.3 17.9
18. Republic of Korea (South Korea) 2002 24.7 11.2 17.9
19. France 2001 26.6 9.1 17.6
20. Republic of Moldova 2003 30.6 4.8 17.2
21. Czech Republic 2003 27.5 6.8 16.9
22. Poland 2002 26.6 5.0 15.5
23. Hong Kong SAR, China 2002 20.7 10.2 15.3
24. Romania 2002 23.9 4.7 14.1
25. Bulgaria 2003 21.0 7.3 14
26. China (selected areas) 1999 13.0 14.8 13.9
27. Denmark 2000 20.2 7.2 13.6
28. Germany 2001 20.4 7.0 13.5
29. Sweden 2001 18.9 8.1 13.4
30. Slovakia 2002 23.6 3.6 13.3
31. Flag of Seychelles Seychelles 1998 NA NA 13.2
32. Flag of Australia Australia 2001 20.1 5.3 12.7
33. Ireland 2001 21.4 4.1 12.7
34. Iceland 2001 19.6 5.6 12.6
35. Canada 2001 18.7 5.2 11.9
36. Mauritius 2000 18.8 5.2 11.9
37. New Zealand 2000 19.8 4.2 11.9
38. Suriname 1992 16.6 7.2 11.9
39. Bosnia and Herzegovina 1991 20.3 3.3 11.8
40. Portugal 2002 18.9 4.9 11.7
41. Trinidad and Tobago 1994 17.4 5 11.6
42. Luxembourg 2003 18.5 3.5 10.9
43. Norway 2002 16.1 5.8 10.9
44. India 1998 12.2 9.1 10.7
45. United States 2002 17.6 4.1 11.0
46. Guyana 1994 14.6 6.5 10.5
47. Uruguay 1990 16.6 4.2 10.3
48. Kyrgyzstan 2003 16.1 3.2 9.6
49. Singapore 2002 11.4 7.6 9.5
50. Netherlands 2003 12.7 5.9 9.2
51. Puerto Rico 1992 16.1 1.9 8.7
52. Turkmenistan 1998 13.8 3.5 8.6
53. Spain 2002 12.6 3.9 8.2
54. El Salvador 1993 10.4 5.5 7.9
55. Zimbabwe 1990 10.6 5.2 7.9
56. Saint Lucia 1988 9.3 5.8 7.5
57. Republic of Macedonia 2000 10.3 4.5 7.4
58. Italy 2001 11.1 3.3 7.1
59. United Kingdom 2002 10.8 3.1 6.9
60. Barbados 1995 9.5 3.7 6.5
61. Belize 1995 12.1 0.9 6.5
62. Argentina 1996 9.9 3.0 6.4
63. Israel 2000 9.9 2.7 6.3
64. Uzbekistan 2002 9.3 3.1 6.2
65. Costa Rica 1995 9.7 2.1 5.9
66. Chile 1994 10.2 1.4 5.7
67. Venezuela 1994 8.3 1.9 5.1
68. Malta 2003 8.6 1.5 5.0
69. Ecuador 1995 6.4 3.2 4.8
70. Brazil 1995 6.6 1.8 4.1
71. Albania 2003 4.7 3.3 4.0
72. Thailand 1994 5.6 2.4 4
73. Panama 1987 5.6 1.9 3.8
74. Colombia 1994 5.5 1.5 3.5
75. Nicaragua 1994 4.7 2.2 3.4
76. Bahrain 1988 4.9 0.5 3.1
77. Mexico 1995 5.4 1.0 3.1
78. Greece 2002 4.7 1.2 2.9
79. Tajikistan 2001 2.9 2.3 2.6
80. Paraguay 1994 3.4 1.2 2.3
81. Georgia 2001 3.4 1.1 2.2
82. Philippines 1993 2.5 1.7 2.1
83. Kuwait 2002 2.5 1.4 2.0
84. Armenia 2003 3.2 0.5 1.8
85. Azerbaijan 2002 1.8 0.5 1.1
86. Bahamas 1995 2.2 0 1.1
87. São Tomé and Príncipe 1987 0 1.8 0.9
88. Guatemala 1984 0.9 0.1 0.5
89. Peru 1989 0.6 0.4 0.5
90. Jamaica 1985 0.5 0.2 0.3
91. Iran 1991 0.3 0.1 0.2
92. Syria 1985 0.2 0.0 0.1
93. Antigua and Barbuda 1995 0 0 0
94. Dominican Republic 1994 0 0 0
95. Egypt 1987 0.1 0 0
96. Honduras 1978 0 0 0
97. Jordan 1979 0 0 0
98. St. Kitts and Nevis 1995 0 0 0
99. St. Vincent and the Grenadines 1996 0 0 0
How happy are you? Participate in a survey :
ReplyDeletehttp://www.happyplanetindex.org/survey.htm
:)
Here are some of the results:
Ecological Footprint
Your ecological footprint is 1.6 global hectares, or 0.89 planets. This is equivalent to the average in countries such as Dominican Republic, Namibia or Thailand.
Your ecological footprint is greater than the average for the country you live in. If you live in a country with large economic inequalities, do note that this might be the case even if you are environmentally aware and trying to reduce your footprint, as others in your country might be living in very different circumstances. For example, Brazil's mean footprint of 2.2 g ha does not distinguish between the very low consumption lives of tribes in the Amazon, and those of people living Western-style lives in the big cities, whose personal footprints will inevitably be much higher.
Congratulations. You are achieving 'one-planet living'. If everyone in the world lived like you, there would be enough resources for the entire human species, if not for other species. If you are living in an industrialised country, be aware that this is no mean feat. Given the infrastructure and society you live in, it is very hard to reduce one's footprint, even when making a big effort. No doubt you take environmental issues very seriously - avoiding motorised transportation, minimising meat in your diet and conserving and recycling where possible.
You:
1.6
Average:
5.33
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]
and here's more:
ReplyDeleteHappy Planet IndexLife Expectancy
Congratulations. Your life expectancy is above average for your gender and country. Whether it's eating well, not smoking, getting regular exercise, or just being lucky enough to have the right genes, you're doing something right. However, nobody's perfect and we could all improve our health a little! Aside from getting all the above bits of your lifestyle right, there are some more surprising factors that can influence your life expect - for example, giving up your car, avoiding living alone, moving out of the city or shrugging off stress.
You:
72.7
Average:
80.7
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]
Interesting report...
ReplyDeleteMethinks so too. That's why we mport anger and frustration from other countries via our call centers. :D
ReplyDeleteI thought Pinoys are the Happiest! hehehe kasi kahit na may sakuna makikita mo sila sa background nakangiti at kumakaway pa sa TV! hehehe no, really! they do!
ReplyDeleteCheck out the update I made on the blog. I included the Suicide Rates per country. :)
ReplyDelete